Pages

Tuesday, 15 May 2012

No We're Not "Born Atheist", Don't Be Silly


A baby, no doubt busy thinking on existential matters.


Atheists are apparently as guilty of making stupid statements as anyone else. No surprises there; we are just people, after all.

Occasionally I’ve heard the idea that “everyone is born an atheist” bandied about on the internet or amongst friends, so I thought I’d take a break from all this studying to address this quickly. Because it’s a pretty silly idea when you look at it closely.

First things first, we need to define what exactly ‘atheism’ is. Offering up a definition of this concept is actually pretty easy, however. To put it simply, atheism is the rejection of theism, or the idea of the existence of god/gods. That’s really it. Nothing more, nothing less.[1] To have no understanding of gods or the supernatural is a different thing entirely; to be an atheist, one must reject theism.

Now let’s consider this idea that we are born atheists.

To be an atheist (that is, to reject the concept of the supernatural or divine) one must first be capable of comprehending what the supernatural or divine is; we need to have an understanding of theism in order to decide that it is worth rejecting. Such a mental process is beyond that of an infant, and runs contrary to the idea of tabula rasa (the blank slate).

In short, babies cannot be atheists. Because babies cannot comprehend the idea of a theist in order to add the ‘a’ to it.

We are not born anything. It takes a long time for the brain to develop enough in order to start grappling with such concepts as religion and the rejection of it. Thus assigning these concepts to babies in an attempt to make a point is ridiculous. A baby cannot be an atheist, just as it cannot be in favour of the war in Afghanistan or a Liberal Democrat supporter. Why?

Because it’s a baby, for fuck’s sake. It’s busy doing baby things. Like crying. And sleeping. And eating. And waking it’s parents up in the middle of the night with strange gurgling sounds.

Statements like “we are all born atheist” might sound funny or clever upon cursory inspection, but when you actually get down to it they’re rather childish and detrimental to the cause those who use them are trying to support. Such phrases are easily deconstructed and therefore bad arguments; using them will make you look stupid when you are debating against any half-competent religious apologist.

So when it comes to the origins of atheism in the human psyche, just bear in mind that it comes about a lot later than infancy. And that saying otherwise can very easily backfire on you.


[1] http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/40634/atheism

6 comments:

  1. I was seriously going to write about this. It's on my "Post Ideas" list.

    Now I can just link to you, thanks. Yes, atheist babies are ridiculous. I've pointed this out to the atheists that have been smugly declaring "We are all born atheist" to theists and they get mad at me. We are skeptical of God, we should be skeptical of our own retarded propaganda too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've had to argue the case a couple times; it's amazing how many people seem to think it's a good argument. You're kind of hitting the nail on the head with the word 'smug'. Bandying this sort of propaganda makes atheists, freethinkers and non-believers sound like arrogant dicks.

      And that's a bad thing.

      Delete
  2. I stopped reading as soon as you defined atheism. Yes, atheism can be an active rejection of the existence of deities, but the people who claim that we are born atheists are referring to the other, more passive, definition; atheism can also be defined as a lack of belief in deities (a-theism being "without a god"). In this way, you are an atheist if you have no belief (e.g. a baby is an atheist).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you "stopped reading" that early in the post then you've kind of missed the part where I talk about what you're referring to, mate.

      Perhaps reading an article fully before commenting on it is something you should consider?

      Delete
  3. Did... what you are suggesting is that atheism can be a position of ignorance. Are you comfortable with saying this? Are you comfortable saying atheism is simply lacking belief because you aren't aware?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Did... what you are suggesting is that atheism can be a position of ignorance. Are you comfortable with saying this? Are you comfortable saying atheism is simply lacking belief because you aren't aware?

    ReplyDelete